The Science Behind Neuroplastic Healing

Chronic pain and persistent symptoms affect an estimated 1.5 billion people worldwide¹ — making it one of the greatest public health challenges of our time. Yet for most of the 20th century, Western medicine held three core false beliefs that kept millions of those people stuck, without real answers:

  • Pain must equal damage somewhere in the body
  • The adult brain was fixed and could not change
  • "Medically unexplained symptoms" (MUS) could not be healed — only managed

Without better tools or understanding, thus no reason to explore brain-based and nervous system approaches, the medical system had little choice but to try and manage symptoms rather than address their actual root cause. This left people feeling hopeless, dismissed, and spending their lives coping rather than recovering.

We now know all three of these beliefs were incomplete. And the science that continues to emerge leaves us more convinced that healing is possible for this specific type of pain and symptom. 

Neuroplastic pain and symptoms are driven by altered nerve pathways in the brain rather than the structural damage or disease that can be seen with medical tests. These symptoms are real and can be highly debilitating — but they are generated by the brain and nervous system, not by ongoing tissue damage.

Instead, it results from physical changes in the brain’s nerve pathways and the way the nervous system processes and responds to perceived threat. 

This type of pain is informed by a nervous system that has learned to stay in a heightened, protective state — often shaped by stress in its many forms: adversity in childhood, difficult life experiences, emotional conflict (both internally with self and externally with others), and/or deeply ingrained learned coping patterns like perfectionism and people-pleasing. This largely happens outside of conscious awareness.

Research in neuroscience has shown that these learned pain pathways can change (a process known as neuroplasticity). With the right approaches—including pain neuroscience education, nervous system regulation, and a deeper understanding of past and present life challenges that may contribute to underlying stress, many people are able to significantly reduce or even eliminate their pain.


 

The Science is Quickly Evolving

The science behind how the brain, nervous system, and lived experience shape both pain and recovery has been evolving rapidly — let's take a look at some of the key scientific milestones.

  • Mid-1990s to 2012 — fMRI technology, which allows researchers to observe brain activity in real time, became widely available for research in the mid-1990s.3 By 2012, studies using this new technology confirmed what researchers were beginning to suspect — that as pain moves from acute to chronic, brain activity shifts away from pain-processing areas into regions associated with learning, memory, and emotion.4 Chronic pain and symptoms, it turns out, become a learned pattern in the brain and nervous system.

  • 2007 — The concept of neuroplasticity — the brain's ability to learn, reorganize, and change — reached popular awareness for the first time. The idea that the adult brain was fixed and unchangeable began to unravel.
  • 2015 — A large imaging study found that disc bulges, degeneration, and other spinal changes appear just as commonly in people with no pain as in those with pain — revealing that these findings are often a normal part of aging, not necessarily the cause of symptoms.5 This directly challenged the belief that pain must equal structural damage — validating the foundations of the mindbody approach pioneered decades earlier by Dr. John Sarno, whose groundbreaking book Healing Back Pain had already helped countless people recover from debilitating pain that medicine could not explain.

  • 2016–2017 — The International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) introduced a new classification of pain called nociplastic pain — pain with no structural or disease damage to explain it.6 This gave an official medical name to what had previously been dismissed as "medically unexplained symptoms" — conditions like fibromyalgia, migraine, pelvic pain, and persistent post-surgical pain.

  • 2020 — IASP took it further and officially updated the definition of pain itself, removing the longstanding requirement for tissue damage to be present.7 A landmark acknowledgment that pain can be real, persistent, and debilitating — without anything structurally wrong.

    That's only six years ago....

  • 2022 — Brain imaging showed something even more remarkable — that after treatment, those overactive learned pain circuits in the brain actually quieted.8 The pattern that had been learned could be unlearned.

    So if you've never heard of this approach — if your doctor hasn't mentioned it — that's not a failure on anyone's part. It's simply how long it takes for a shift in science to reach everyday medical practice.

    That gap is exactly why HealABLE Pathways exists.

Interested to read the research?

Jeffrey Axelbank, PsyD, Georgie Oldfield, MCSP, and David Clarke, MD create a Bibliography and comprehensive view of research around the diagnosis, treatment and relief from persistent pain or illness not caused by organ disease or structural injury. 

Due to the wide range of specialties that have addressed these issues, the relevant science has been published in a large number of journals making it a challenge to comprehensively review. Consequently, few clinicians are aware of the quality and quantity of evidence supporting a psychological approach to neuroplastic symptoms.

The bibliography  compiles the most relevant published research. As of September 2025, this included 237 resources. Each paper is annotated with a description of its key findings.

Bibliography of Scientific Research

References ¹ Goldberg, D.S. & McGee, S.J. (2011). Pain as a global public health priority. BMC Public Health, 11, 770. ² Doidge, N. (2007). The Brain That Changes Itself. Viking Press. ³ Ogawa S, et al. (1990). Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation. PNAS, 87(24), 9868–9872. ⁴ Baliki et al. (2012). Corticostriatal functional connectivity predicts transition to chronic back pain. Nature Neuroscience, 15(8), 1117–1119. ⁵ Brinjikji et al. (2015). Systematic literature review of imaging features of spinal degeneration in asymptomatic populations. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 36(4), 811–816. ⁶ Kosek E, et al. (2016). Do we need a third mechanistic descriptor for chronic pain states? Pain, 157(7), 1382–1386. ⁷ Raja et al. (2020). The revised IASP definition of pain. Pain, 161(9), 1976–1982. ⁸ Ashar YK, Gordon A, Schubiner H, et al. (2022). Effect of Pain Reprocessing Therapy vs Placebo and Usual Care for Patients With Chronic Back Pain. JAMA Psychiatry, 79(1), 13–23. symptomatic.me